This is the 8th post in Environmental Law, Unit V — this post covers the 1982 Nairobi session, a ten-year review of the Stockholm Conference that, despite producing no binding treaty of its own, set in motion the process that gave the world the concept of "sustainable development".
Before going further, a correction is necessary: there is no binding treaty called the "Nairobi Convention, 1982". What actually took place was a Special Session of UNEP's Governing Council, held in Nairobi, Kenya, from 10 to 18 May 1982, convened specifically to mark the tenth anniversary of the 1972 Stockholm Conference and to review what progress — if any — had been made in the decade since. The session adopted a political statement known as the Nairobi Declaration, which is soft law, like the Stockholm Declaration itself, rather than a convention creating binding obligations. Understanding why this review mattered requires recalling the problem Stockholm was meant to solve: ten years on, had the international community actually delivered on Stockholm's promise, or had environmental degradation simply continued while everyone quoted its Principles?
The honest answer the Nairobi session reached was largely the second one. Despite Stockholm's Principles and the creation of UNEP itself, the Nairobi Declaration recorded that environmental degradation had, in many respects, worsened rather than improved over the preceding decade — deforestation, desertification, loss of species and genetic diversity, and pollution of air, water, and soil were all found to be continuing at alarming rates, and in several areas outpacing whatever progress had been achieved. Rather than treating this as a reason for despair, the Declaration called for renewed and strengthened national and international commitment to environmental protection, and — most significantly for what followed — recommended that a special, high-level commission be established to conduct a long-term study of the relationship between environmental protection and economic development.
This recommendation was acted upon the following year: the UN General Assembly, by Resolution 38/161 of 1983, established the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), chaired by Norwegian Prime Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland and commonly called the Brundtland Commission. After four years of study and public hearings across the world, the Commission published its report, "Our Common Future" (the Brundtland Report), in 1987. This report is where the phrase "sustainable development" was popularised and given its most widely quoted definition — development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs — a concept that resolved, at least conceptually, the same environment-versus-development tension that had dominated the Stockholm Conference and Indira Gandhi's speech there, discussed in this unit's fourth post. The Brundtland Report's concept of sustainable development directly shaped the agenda of, and was formally endorsed at, the 1992 Rio Earth Summit covered in the next post of this unit.
From Stockholm to Rio — the sustainable development lineage: 1972 — Stockholm Conference → 1982 — Nairobi Declaration, a ten-year review finds degradation had worsened → 1983 — the Brundtland Commission is established, UNGA Resolution 38/161 → 1987 — "Our Common Future" popularises "sustainable development" → 1992 — Rio Earth Summit.
Suppose an exam question asks a student to trace the origin of the term "sustainable development" as used in Indian environmental jurisprudence, such as in the Narmada Bachao Andolan or Vellore Citizens' Welfare Forum cases discussed elsewhere in this subject. A complete answer should not start with Rio 1992 alone — it should trace back through the Brundtland Commission's 1987 report to the Nairobi session's 1982 recommendation that such a commission be formed in the first place, which itself was a direct response to the sobering finding, ten years after Stockholm, that environmental protection commitments were not being honoured. This full chain is exactly what distinguishes a strong answer from a superficial one on this topic.