Home  ›  Legal Maxims  ›  Criminal  ›  Nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare
Home  ›  Legal Maxims  ›  Nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare

Nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare

Maxim
Criminal
Literal meaningNo one is bound to accuse himself
PronunciationNAY-moh ten-AY-tur say IP-sum ak-yoo-SAH-ray

An accused person cannot be forced to give evidence against themselves. It is the right against self-incrimination.

Example

A police officer cannot force a suspect to confess by threat. A confession got by force cannot be used against him.

Case laws
  • State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad (1961), Supreme Court: giving fingerprints and handwriting samples is not being a witness against oneself.
  • Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010), Supreme Court: forced narco-analysis, polygraph and brain-mapping tests violate Article 20(3).
Statutory link

Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India: no person accused of an offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.

Exceptions / limits

Giving physical samples such as fingerprints is not testimony, so it is outside the protection.

Exam tip

Asked with Article 20(3) and the Kathi Kalu Oghad distinction.

Memory trick

Your mouth cannot be used against you.

Key takeaway

No accused can be forced to testify against themselves.

Home Browse Search Saved