Read the full set here, or use the practice card above to test yourself one question at a time.
Negligence in tort law is best defined as:
Explanation. Negligence is the breach of a legal duty to take care, resulting in damage to the person to whom the duty was owed.
The rule of strict liability originates from which case?
Explanation. Strict liability is the rule from Rylands v. Fletcher — liability for a dangerous thing escaping from one's land, even without negligence.
Absolute liability, as laid down in M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987), differs from strict liability because it:
Explanation. Absolute liability applies to hazardous industries and admits none of strict liability's traditional defences.
The "no-fault liability" provision for motor vehicle accident victims in India is found in:
Explanation. Section 164 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides fixed compensation regardless of proof of fault.
Under Section 164 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, compensation is payable:
Explanation. Section 164 compensation is payable regardless of whether negligence by the driver or owner is proved.
A minor who wishes to sue in tort must do so through a:
Explanation. A minor cannot sue in their own name; the suit must be brought on their behalf by a next friend or guardian.
A corporation can sue for civil wrongs affecting:
Explanation. A corporation can sue for wrongs affecting its property or reputation, but not for personal wrongs unrelated to either.
The State's immunity from tort liability, as seen in P. and O. Steam Navigation Co. v. Secretary of State (1861), applies to:
Explanation. The State is immune for acts done in a sovereign capacity but liable for torts committed in a non-sovereign capacity.