Read the full set here, or use the practice card above to test yourself one question at a time.
Under Section 2(10) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, 'defect' applies to
Explanation. 'Defect' under Section 2(10) is defined specifically in relation to goods or products.
A trader advertises a claim about a product's performance that the product does not actually meet, even though no separate law or contract required that specific standard. Can this still amount to a 'defect'?
Explanation. 'Defect' under Section 2(10) expressly includes a shortfall against a standard 'claimed by the trader in any manner whatsoever' about the goods.
Under Section 2(11), 'deficiency' in a service expressly includes
Explanation. Section 2(11) expressly writes negligence and deliberate withholding of relevant information into the definition of 'deficiency'.
How does proof of a defect in goods usually differ from proof of a deficiency in a service?
Explanation. Goods can be sent to an appropriate laboratory for analysis or test (section 38(2)(c)). A service is judged on the evidence, affidavits and documents.
In Indian Medical Association v. V.P. Shantha, what did the Supreme Court hold about medical services?
Explanation. The Supreme Court held that medical services rendered for consideration fall within 'service' under the Act, making patients 'consumers' with a right to complain of deficiency.
In V.P. Shantha, which medical treatment did the Supreme Court hold to fall outside 'service'?
Explanation. V.P. Shantha held that medical service is a service, except where it is rendered completely free of charge to every patient, or under a contract of personal service. Section 2(42) excludes both.
The reasoning in V.P. Shantha, applying 'deficiency in service' to doctors, extends equally to which other category of service providers?
Explanation. The same statutory logic applied to doctors in V.P. Shantha applies to any service provider — banks, insurers, transporters, builders, and so on.
How is a defect in goods or a deficiency in a service usually proved before a Commission?
Explanation. Under section 38(2)(c) a sample of the goods can be sent to an appropriate laboratory. For a service, the proof is by evidence, affidavits and documents.
A hospital argues a consumer forum has no jurisdiction over a doctor's negligent treatment because medical discipline belongs only to professional bodies. Applying V.P. Shantha, is this argument correct?
Explanation. V.P. Shantha expressly rejected the immunity argument — professional body oversight does not exclude a consumer forum's concurrent jurisdiction over deficiency in a paid medical service.
A doctor administers a high-risk medication without checking the patient's known allergy history, causing permanent disability, at a fee-charging hospital. Does this satisfy the definition of 'deficiency'?
Explanation. A negligent act causing injury during a paid service squarely satisfies 'deficiency' under Section 2(11), consistent with V.P. Shantha's extension of 'service' to fee-charging medical treatment.