Void and Voidable contracts

Sections 2(g), 2(i), 2(j), 19, 56, 64 and 65 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872

7 min read
Capacity, Consent and Validity of Agreements

In one minute

The Act uses three similar words for three different things. A void agreement is never enforceable. A voidable contract is valid until the wronged party cancels it. A void contract was valid when made but later stops being enforceable.

These labels decide who can sue and what happens to money already paid. In exams, the three definitions and the table are the marks. In real life they decide whether you can walk away from a deal and get your money back.

Exam focus

  • Frequency: Occasionally asked
  • Usually asked as: Short answer (4 to 6 marks)

Legal provision

  • Section 2(g): an agreement not enforceable by law is void.
  • Section 2(h): an agreement enforceable by law is a contract.
  • Section 2(i): an agreement enforceable by law at the option of one or more of the parties, but not at the option of the other or others, is a voidable contract.
  • Section 2(j): a contract which ceases to be enforceable by law becomes void when it ceases to be enforceable.
  • Section 19: when consent is caused by coercion, fraud or misrepresentation, the contract is voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused. He may instead insist on performance, as if the representations had been true.
  • Section 56: a contract to do an act that, after the contract is made, becomes impossible, or becomes unlawful by reason of an event the promisor could not prevent, becomes void when the act becomes impossible or unlawful.
  • Section 64: when a person at whose option a contract is voidable rescinds it, the other party need not perform his promises. The rescinding party restores any benefit he received, so far as may be.
  • Section 65: when an agreement is discovered to be void, or a contract becomes void, a person who received any advantage under it must restore it or make compensation for it.

Meaning and definition

A void agreement never became a contract. A voidable contract is a contract that one party can choose to end. A void contract was a contract and later lost its force.

The key question is always timing and choice. When did it fail, and who decides?

Enforceability of agreements under section 2How to read this: start at the top box and follow the lines down. Green boxes are the end points.
  • Agreement section 2(e)
    • Void agreement section 2(g)Not enforceable from the start. For example a minor's agreement, a wager, an uncertain agreement.
    • Contract section 2(h)
      • Valid contractEnforceable by both parties.
      • Voidable contract section 2(i)Enforceable at one party's option. For example, consent caused by coercion, undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation.
      • Void contract section 2(j)Valid when made, later ceases to be enforceable. For example, a promise that becomes impossible or unlawful (section 56).

Detailed explanation

Step 1: void agreement (section 2(g))

No one can enforce it, and nothing needs to be done to end it.

Example. A 16-year-old signs an agreement to buy a motorbike. It is void from the start. The seller cannot enforce it.

Step 2: voidable contract (section 2(i))

The contract is binding unless and until the party with the option avoids it. The other party cannot avoid it.

Example. Suresh buys a plot because the seller lied about a road to it. The contract is voidable at Suresh's option. Until he avoids it, it binds both sides.

Step 3: the choices under section 19

The party whose consent was caused by coercion, fraud or misrepresentation may avoid the contract. After fraud or misrepresentation he may instead insist on performance and on being put in the position he would have held if the statements had been true. The Act's illustration (c): A fraudulently says his estate is free from debt, and B buys it. The estate is mortgaged. B may avoid the contract, or insist that it be carried out and the mortgage debt redeemed.

Step 4: void contract (section 2(j) and section 56)

A void contract was valid at the start. It fails later, for example when performance becomes impossible or unlawful after the contract is made.

Example. A trader agrees to supply an imported chemical to a factory every month for two years. After eight months, a new law bans its sale. The contract was valid when made. It becomes void when performance becomes unlawful (section 56).

Step 5: restoring benefits (sections 64 and 65)

Section 64 applies when the option-holder rescinds a voidable contract. He restores any benefit received, and the other party need not perform. Section 65 applies when an agreement is discovered to be void or a contract becomes void. The person who got an advantage restores it or pays compensation.

The Act's illustration (d) to section 65: A contracts to sing at a concert for Rs 1,000, paid in advance, and is too ill to sing. A is not bound to compensate B for lost profits, but must refund the Rs 1,000.

Don't confuse: void agreement, voidable contract and void contract

Students lose marks by using the three words as if they meant the same. Three questions separate them: when it fails, who decides, and what is left.

PointVoid agreement (2(g))Voidable contract (2(i))Void contract (2(j))
When it failsFrom the startWhen the option-holder avoids itAfter formation, when it ceases to be enforceable
Who decidesNo one. The law decidesThe option-holderEvents decide
Until thenNot a contract at allA binding contractA binding contract
ExampleMinor's agreementConsent caused by fraudPerformance made unlawful by a new law

Inside the idea. A buyer signs because the seller concealed that the shop has a pending demolition order. The buyer may avoid the contract. It is voidable, not void.

Just outside it. Two friends bet Rs 1,000 on a match. The agreement is void from the start. No one has an option, and it was never a contract.

Common mistakes

  • Using "void" and "voidable" as the same thing. Voidable gives one party a choice.
  • Saying a void contract was void from the beginning. That is a void agreement. A void contract fails later.
  • Forgetting that the other party cannot avoid a voidable contract.
  • Applying sections 64 and 65 to a minor's agreement. The Privy Council held they presuppose a contract with a competent party.

Apply it

Problem

Manoj agrees to supply a particular imported chemical to Naveen's factory every month for two years. Naveen pays an advance of Rs 2 lakh for the next three months' supply. Before that supply is made, a new law bans the sale of the chemical. What is the position?

Issue. What is the effect of the law on the contract, and what happens to the advance?

Rule. A contract to do an act that becomes unlawful after the contract is made becomes void when the act becomes unlawful (section 56). A person who got an advantage under a contract that becomes void must restore it or make compensation (section 65).

Application. The contract was valid when made. The new law made further supply unlawful, so the contract becomes void. Manoj holds an advance for supplies he can no longer make.

Conclusion. The contract becomes void. Manoj must refund the Rs 2 lakh advance to Naveen (section 65).

Leading case laws

  • Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose (1903)

    Facts. An infant mortgaged houses for Rs 20,000 to a money lender whose attorney knew of his age. The lender asked that he at least repay the money, relying on sections 64 and 65.

    Principle. Whether a contract is void or voidable presupposes a contract within the meaning of the Act. An infant's agreement is not one, so section 64 cannot apply. Section 65 starts from an agreement between competent parties and also does not apply.

    Why it matters. It marks the limit of sections 64 and 65: they work only where there is a contract with competent parties.

How to write this answer in the exam

5-mark answer

  1. Define void agreement, voidable contract and void contract using section 2.
  2. Give one example of each.
  3. State the choice under section 19.
  4. State the duty to restore under sections 64 and 65.

10-mark answer

  1. Section 2(e) to (j) in order.
  2. Comparison table of the three.
  3. Examples of void agreements and of voidable contracts.
  4. Section 56 and void contracts.
  5. Section 19 choices, with illustration (c).
  6. Sections 64 and 65, and the Mohori Bibee limit.

Key points to remember

  • Void agreement: never enforceable (section 2(g)).
  • Voidable contract: enforceable until the option-holder avoids it (section 2(i)).
  • Void contract: valid when made, later ceases to be enforceable (section 2(j)).
  • The wronged party can avoid, or after fraud or misrepresentation insist on performance (section 19).
  • Section 64: the party who rescinds restores benefits. Section 65: benefits under a void agreement or contract are restored.

Quick self-test

1. What is a voidable contract?

An agreement enforceable by law at the option of one or more of the parties, but not at the option of the other or others (section 2(i)).

2. How does a void contract differ from a void agreement?

A void contract was valid when made and later ceases to be enforceable. A void agreement is not enforceable from the start.

3. What must a party do who rescinds a voidable contract?

Restore any benefit he received under it, so far as may be (section 64).

Home Browse Search Saved