Read the full set here, or use the practice card above to test yourself one question at a time.
Under Section 72, money paid or goods delivered by mistake or under coercion:
Explanation. Section 72 requires repayment or return. The recipient's good faith is not the test.
In illustration (a) to Section 72, B pays a jointly-owed debt a second time because he did not know A had already paid. C must:
Explanation. Since B paid under a genuine mistake of fact, C is bound to refund the duplicate payment to B.
In Sales Tax Officer, Banaras v. Kanhaiya Lal Mukundlal Saraf, the Supreme Court held that "mistake" under Section 72 covers:
Explanation. The Court followed the Privy Council in Shiba Prasad Singh: "mistake" in Section 72 covers a mistake of law as well as a mistake of fact.
In illustration (b) to Section 72, a consignee pays an illegal railway charge to obtain his goods. He can recover:
Explanation. He is entitled to recover so much of the charge as was illegally excessive, as stated in the illustration itself.
"Coercion" as used in Section 72 is best described as:
Explanation. "Coercion" in Section 72 is not tied to the technical definition in Section 15. It is used in the general and ordinary sense and covers every kind of forced pressure.
To succeed under Section 72, the payer must show:
Explanation. Section 72 requires only that the payment/delivery was by mistake or under coercion — no fault or bad faith of the recipient needs to be shown.
The railway company illustration under Section 72 shows that coercion in this context can arise from:
Explanation. The railway withheld the consignee's goods unless he paid an illegal charge. That is compulsion in the general sense, with no offence threatened.
Priya accidentally pays a duplicate electricity bill due to a billing system error. Under Section 72, the utility company:
Explanation. The second payment was made by mistake, so Section 72 requires the utility to refund it. The recipient's good faith is not the test.