Read the full set here, or use the practice card above to test yourself one question at a time.
A standard form contract is best described as:
Explanation. A standard form contract (contract of adhesion) is pre-drafted by one party, usually with greater bargaining power, and offered without real room for negotiation.
In L'Estrange v. Graucob, the court held that a person who signs a contractual document:
Explanation. Signature is treated as conclusive proof of assent to a document's terms, whether or not the signatory actually read it, absent fraud or misrepresentation.
Central Inland Water Transport Corp. v. Brojo Nath Ganguly held that unconscionable standard form terms are void under:
Explanation. The Supreme Court held such terms void under Section 23 as against public policy, especially where bargaining power is grossly unequal.
Which legislation gives legal recognition to electronic contracts in India?
Explanation. While the Contract Act's ordinary rules apply to e-contracts, the Information Technology Act, 2000 (Sections 4, 10A) specifically removes doubt about their enforceability.
Under Section 10A of the IT Act, 2000, a contract formed through electronic means:
Explanation. Section 10A states an electronic contract cannot be deemed unenforceable solely on the ground that it was formed electronically.
In Trimex International v. Vedanta Aluminium, the Supreme Court held that a contract was formed:
Explanation. The Court held a binding contract existed once offer and acceptance were complete via email — the later absence of a signed document didn't undo it.
A clickwrap e-contract is one where the user:
Explanation. A clickwrap contract requires an explicit affirmative action — clicking 'I Agree' — as opposed to browsewrap, where terms apply merely by using the site.
Section 4 of the IT Act, 2000 provides that:
Explanation. Section 4 gives legal recognition to electronic records — wherever a law requires something 'in writing', an accessible electronic version satisfies that requirement.
Under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, an 'unfair contract' includes terms that:
Explanation. Section 2(46) defines an unfair contract as one whose terms cause a significant change in the consumer's rights, with listed examples such as manifestly excessive deposits and unilateral termination.