Read the full set here, or use the practice card above to test yourself one question at a time.
Under Section 27(1), rescission may be adjudged where the contract is:
Explanation. Section 27(1)(a) allows rescission where the contract is voidable or terminable by the plaintiff.
Which of the following is NOT a ground on which a court may refuse rescission under Section 27(2)?
Explanation. Being a minor is not a ground in Section 27(2). The four grounds are ratification, parties not substantially restorable, third-party rights acquired in good faith, without notice and for value, and a part that is not severable.
Under Section 28, if a purchaser fails to pay within the time allowed by a specific-performance decree, the vendor may:
Explanation. Section 28 lets the vendor apply in the same suit for rescission of a specific-performance decree where the purchaser fails to pay in time.
Under Section 29, a plaintiff suing for specific performance may:
Explanation. Section 29 allows a plaintiff to plead rescission as an alternative prayer within the same specific-performance suit.
Under Section 30, on adjudging rescission the court may require the party granted it to:
Explanation. Section 30 lets the court require the party to restore, so far as may be, any benefit received and to make any compensation justice requires.
Under Section 31, a suit for cancellation of an instrument can be filed by a person who:
Explanation. Section 31(1) allows a proactive suit by a person with reasonable apprehension of serious injury from a void/voidable instrument, even before it is used against him.
If the instrument sought to be cancelled has been registered, Section 31(2) requires that:
Explanation. Section 31(2) requires the court to send a copy of its decree to the registering officer to note the cancellation on the record.
Under Section 33(2), a DEFENDANT who successfully resists a suit on the ground that the instrument is voidable may be required, if he received a benefit under it, to:
Explanation. Section 33(2)(a): where the instrument is voidable, the court may require the defendant to restore the benefit or compensate for it. Under 33(2)(b), where the agreement is void because he was not competent to contract, he restores it only to the extent he or his estate benefited.