Read the full set here, or use the practice card above to test yourself one question at a time.
Rectification under Section 26 is available where a written instrument fails to express the parties' real intention due to:
Explanation. Section 26 requires fraud or a MUTUAL mistake. The note says the Act does not allow rectification for a mistake made by one party alone.
Which of the following CANNOT be rectified under Section 26?
Explanation. The main text of Section 26 expressly excludes a company's articles of association from rectification under this section.
Under Section 26(2), rectification is:
Explanation. Section 26(2) makes rectification discretionary, and it cannot be ordered where it would prejudice rights already acquired by third persons in good faith and for value.
Under Section 26(3), a rectified contract may then be:
Explanation. Section 26(3) allows a contract to be first rectified and then specifically enforced in the same proceeding, if properly pleaded.
A key distinguishing feature of rectification, compared to rescission, is that rectification:
Explanation. Rectification fixes the document's wording; the underlying contract survives and continues, unlike rescission which undoes the contract.
Rectification is NOT available to a party who:
Explanation. Rectification is not a tool for a party who made a bad bargain knowingly — the writing must have failed to capture the real agreement, not merely turned out unwise.
Who may bring a suit for rectification under Section 26(1)(a)?
Explanation. Section 26(1)(a) allows either party or his representative in interest to institute a suit for rectification.
A rectification claim can also be raised:
Explanation. Section 26(1)(b) and (c) allow rectification to be claimed within an existing suit, or raised defensively by a defendant.