Read the full set here, or use the practice card above to test yourself one question at a time.
A suit under Section 5 of the Specific Relief Act to recover immovable property is based on:
Explanation. Section 5 is the ordinary title suit — the plaintiff must succeed on the strength of his own title, in the manner provided by the CPC.
Under Section 6, a suit to recover possession must be filed within:
Explanation. Section 6(2)(a) requires the suit to be filed within six months of dispossession — a very short window.
In a suit under Section 6, the defendant:
Explanation. Section 6(1) expressly excludes title as a defence — the only question is whether the plaintiff was dispossessed without consent and without due process.
A suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act cannot be filed against:
Explanation. Section 6(2)(b) bars a suit under this section from being brought against the Government.
From an order or decree passed in a Section 6 suit:
Explanation. Section 6(3) bars both appeal and review from an order or decree in a Section 6 suit.
In Lallu Yeshwant Singh v. Rao Jagdish Singh, the Supreme Court held that:
Explanation. The Court held that even a rightful owner cannot use force to evict someone in settled possession — the remedy is to go to court, not to self-help.
Under Section 8, a non-owner in possession can be compelled to deliver specific movable property when:
Explanation. Section 8(b) allows this where money compensation would not adequately compensate for the loss of the specific thing.
Which sub-section of Section 6 preserves a person's right to file a separate title suit even after losing a Section 6 possessory suit?
Explanation. Section 6(4) makes clear that nothing in the section bars a person from filing a separate suit to establish title and recover possession on that basis.