Read the full set here, or use the practice card above to test yourself one question at a time.
A quasi-contract is best described as:
Explanation. A quasi-contract is a legal fiction — there is no real offer, acceptance, or consensus; the law simply imposes contract-like obligations.
The underlying principle behind Sections 68–72 is:
Explanation. The principle nemo debet locupletari ex aliena jactura — no one should grow rich at another's expense — underlies this entire chapter.
In Moses v. Macferlan, Lord Mansfield held that where the defendant is obliged by natural justice and equity to refund money, the law implies:
Explanation. Lord Mansfield held that the law implies a debt and treats the obligation as arising as if by contract, although no real agreement to repay exists.
Under Section 68, necessaries supplied to a person incapable of contracting are recoverable:
Explanation. Section 68 allows reimbursement only from the incapable person's own property, not a personal claim against them.
Under Section 69, a person is entitled to reimbursement for paying money that another was legally bound to pay, provided:
Explanation. Section 69 requires the payer to have a genuine interest in the payment, as illustrated by B protecting his own lease by paying A's revenue dues.
Which of the following is an example of a quasi-contractual obligation?
Explanation. Section 71's finder-of-goods rule is a specific example of the same unjust-enrichment principle applied to found property.