Read the full set here, or use the practice card above to test yourself one question at a time.
Under Section 2(d), consideration must move at:
Explanation. Consideration must be given at the desire of the promisor — an act done voluntarily or at someone else's request is not valid consideration.
In Durga Prasad v. Baldeo, the plaintiff's claim failed because:
Explanation. His original effort was done at the Collector's request, not the shopkeepers' — so it wasn't valid consideration for their later promise to pay commission.
Which of these is required for consideration to be valid?
Explanation. Consideration must be real and lawful, but need not be adequate — courts don't assess fairness of the exchange, only that something of value was genuinely given.
Under Section 25, which of these is NOT a listed exception to 'no consideration, no contract'?
Explanation. A promise made under undue influence is not an exception to the consideration requirement — it's a separate ground affecting free consent.
Under Section 185, a contract of agency requires:
Explanation. Section 185 explicitly states no consideration is necessary to create an agency — a specific exception outside Section 25's own text.
Consideration that has already been performed before a promise is made is called:
Explanation. Past consideration is something already done before the promise was made — valid in India (unlike the stricter English position), provided it was done at the promisor's desire.
A father signs and registers a written promise to give his son Rs 1,000 out of natural love and affection. Nothing is given in return. The promise is:
Explanation. This is Section 25(1), as in the Act's illustration (b): written, registered, between near relatives and out of natural love and affection. It is a contract although nothing is given in return.
If B finds A's lost wallet and returns it, and A later promises to pay B ₹500 as thanks, this promise is enforceable under:
Explanation. This is Section 25(2) — a promise to compensate someone who has already voluntarily done something for the promisor is enforceable, even without fresh consideration.