Read the full set here, or use the practice card above to test yourself one question at a time.
Under Section 4, communication of an acceptance is complete as against the proposer when:
Explanation. Communication of acceptance is complete against the proposer the moment it is posted/transmitted — this is the postal rule.
In Felthouse v. Bindley, the court held that:
Explanation. The court held an offeror cannot impose an obligation on the offeree to reject an offer — silence, even when the offeror tries to redefine it as acceptance, is not valid acceptance.
In Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt, the plaintiff's claim for the reward failed because:
Explanation. Lalman had no knowledge of the reward offer at the time he searched for the boy, so there was no valid acceptance — knowledge of the offer is essential.
Under Section 6, which of the following does NOT revoke a proposal?
Explanation. Acceptance completes the contract; it does not revoke the proposal. The other three are all valid modes of revocation under Section 6.
In Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co., the court held that performing the conditions of a general offer:
Explanation. The court held that performing the stated conditions of a general offer is itself acceptance under Section 8 — no separate communication is needed.
Bhagwandas Kedia v. Girdharilal Parshottamdas held that for instantaneous communication like telephone, a contract is complete:
Explanation. The Supreme Court held the postal rule does not extend to instantaneous communication — the contract completes only where and when heard by the proposer.
For a valid acceptance under Section 7, the acceptance must be:
Explanation. Section 7 requires acceptance to be absolute and unqualified, matching the offer exactly — a qualified 'yes, but' is a counter-offer, not acceptance.
An acceptance may be revoked by the acceptor at any time:
Explanation. Under Section 5, an acceptance may be revoked any time before it is complete as against the acceptor — which happens only when it reaches the proposer.
Section 10A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 says that a contract formed through electronic means:
Explanation. Section 10A says that where a proposal, acceptance or revocation is in electronic form, the contract cannot be held unenforceable only because of that.
Under Section 13 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, the despatch of an electronic record occurs when it:
Explanation. Section 13(1): despatch occurs when the record enters a computer resource outside the originator's control, unless the parties agree otherwise.
If the receiver has designated a computer resource and the record is sent to that resource, receipt occurs when:
Explanation. Section 13(2)(a)(i): receipt occurs when the record enters the designated computer resource.
A e-mails an offer to B and then e-mails a revocation, which B has not yet read. B e-mails an acceptance. The revocation is complete against B:
Explanation. Under Section 4, a revocation is complete against the person to whom it is made when it comes to that person's knowledge. B's acceptance was therefore in time under Section 5.