MCQ Practice
Practice questions

Recent Trends in the institution of marriage — MCQs

Question 1 of 8
Score: 0/0

All questions with answers and explanations

Read the full set here, or use the practice card above to test yourself one question at a time.

  1. In Badri Prasad v. Deputy Director of Consolidation, long cohabitation as husband and wife raises:

    • An irrebuttable presumption of marriage
    • A rebuttable presumption of a valid marriage (correct answer)
    • No legal presumption at all
    • A presumption of divorce

    Explanation. The Court held that long cohabitation raises a strong but rebuttable presumption of a valid marriage.

  2. D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal laid down conditions for a relationship to qualify as "in the nature of marriage" under:

    • The Hindu Marriage Act
    • The Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (correct answer)
    • The Indian Penal Code
    • The Special Marriage Act

    Explanation. The four-condition test applies to protection under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

  3. According to Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma, a relationship where one partner is already married to someone else is:

    • Fully protected under the Domestic Violence Act
    • Not covered, where the woman knowingly lives with a married man (correct answer)
    • Automatically a valid marriage
    • Void under Section 11

    Explanation. The Court held that a woman who knowingly lives with a married man is not covered, and asked Parliament to legislate for such women and children.

  4. In Lata Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, the Supreme Court held that:

    • Inter-caste marriages should be discouraged
    • An adult has an absolute right to marry a person of their own choice (correct answer)
    • Only arranged marriages are valid
    • Parental consent is mandatory for adult marriage

    Explanation. The Court held that an adult has an absolute right to marry a person of their own choice.

  5. Shakti Vahini v. Union of India laid down guidelines primarily against:

    • Inter-caste marriages
    • Honour crimes and khap panchayat interference (correct answer)
    • Live-in relationships
    • Registration delays

    Explanation. Shakti Vahini laid down preventive, remedial, and punitive guidelines against honour crimes and khap panchayat interference.

  6. In Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty v. Union of India (2023), the Supreme Court held that recognition of same-sex marriage:

    • Is already available under the Hindu Marriage Act
    • Is a matter for Parliament, not the judiciary, to create through new legislation (correct answer)
    • Was fully granted by the Court
    • Is permanently barred by the Constitution

    Explanation. The Court held that creating a legal framework for same-sex marriage is a matter for Parliament.

  7. The four conditions in D. Velusamy include all of the following EXCEPT:

    • Holding themselves out to society as spouses
    • Both being of legal age to marry
    • Payment of dowry by one party (correct answer)
    • Voluntary cohabitation for a significant period

    Explanation. Payment of dowry is not one of the four Velusamy conditions.

  8. Does Domestic Violence Act protection for a live-in partner amount to full marital status for all legal purposes?

    • Yes, completely equivalent
    • No, it is a specific statutory remedy, not general marital status (correct answer)
    • Only for tax purposes
    • Only if registered separately

    Explanation. Such protection is a specific statutory remedy, not a general declaration of marital status.

Home Browse Search Saved