MCQ Practice
Practice questions

Partition — MCQs

Question 1 of 10
Score: 0/0

All questions with answers and explanations

Read the full set here, or use the practice card above to test yourself one question at a time.

  1. Which of these correctly describes 'severance of status' in Hindu law?

    • The physical division of family property
    • A purely legal change ending a coparcener's joint status (correct answer)
    • A ceremony performed by the Karta
    • A court order allotting specific plots

    Explanation. Severance of status is a change in legal relationship only — it needs no physical division of property at all.

  2. In Addagada Raghavamma v. Addagada Chenchamma (1964), the Supreme Court held that severance of status requires:

    • A registered partition deed only
    • An unequivocal declaration of intent, communicated to the other coparceners (correct answer)
    • A court decree only
    • Physical division of all assets first

    Explanation. The Court held severance requires a clear, unequivocal declaration of intent to separate, which must be communicated to the other affected coparceners.

  3. 'Division by metes and bounds' refers to:

    • The legal severance of status only
    • The actual, physical division of property into specific shares (correct answer)
    • A father's power over his sons
    • The reopening of a partition

    Explanation. Division by metes and bounds is the actual, physical division of property into specific, individual shares — the second stage of partition.

  4. Which of the following can demand partition since the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005?

    • Only sons
    • Only the father
    • Both sons and daughters, on equal footing (correct answer)
    • Only the eldest male coparcener

    Explanation. Since 2005, daughters have exactly the same right as sons to demand partition and receive a share.

  5. If a son is in the womb at the time of a partition, the completed partition:

    • Is void
    • Can be reopened for him (correct answer)
    • Cannot be reopened in any case
    • Is valid only after he is born

    Explanation. A completed partition is final, but it can be reopened for fraud, for a minor's unprotected interest or for a son in the womb.

  6. Which of these is a recognised ground for reopening a completed partition?

    • A coparcener simply changing their mind later
    • Fraud in the original division (correct answer)
    • General family disagreement afterward
    • One member becoming wealthier than others

    Explanation. Fraud (along with an unprotected minor's interest, a son in the womb, a wrongly excluded disqualified/absent coparcener, or a validly adopted son) is a recognised ground for reopening.

  7. How does 'reopening' a partition differ from 'reunion'?

    • They are the same thing
    • Reopening corrects a defect in an existing partition; reunion is a fresh, mutual agreement to rejoin the family (correct answer)
    • Reopening is only for movable property
    • Reunion requires no consent from anyone

    Explanation. Reopening fixes a flawed existing partition, while reunion is an entirely new event requiring the genuine, mutual consent of all parties to rejoin as a joint family.

  8. Under section 6(5) of the Hindu Succession Act, section 6 does not apply to a partition effected before:

    • 1 January 1956
    • 20 December 2004 (correct answer)
    • 9 September 2005
    • 1 April 2010

    Explanation. Section 6(5) says section 6 does not apply to a partition effected before 20 December 2004. For section 6, partition means a partition by a registered deed or by a decree of a court.

  9. Under the Explanation to Section 6(5) of the Hindu Succession Act, 'partition' means:

    • Any oral family arrangement
    • A partition by a duly registered deed, or by a decree of a court (correct answer)
    • Only a partition by court decree
    • Any informal division of possession

    Explanation. The Explanation limits 'partition' to a registered deed of partition or a decree of a court.

  10. Under Section 6(3), when a coparcener dies after the 2005 Act, his interest devolves:

    • By survivorship
    • By testamentary or intestate succession, with the coparcenary property deemed divided by a notional partition (correct answer)
    • To the Karta only
    • To the eldest son only

    Explanation. Section 6(3) replaces survivorship with succession, after a notional partition.

Home Browse Search Saved