Read the full set here, or use the practice card above to test yourself one question at a time.
Section 2 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 applies to:
Explanation. Section 2 extends the Act to Hindus, Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs, and to anyone not shown to be governed by another personal law.
Before the 2005 Amendment, agricultural land was excluded from the Act by which provision?
Explanation. Section 4(2), since omitted by the 2005 Amendment, originally excluded agricultural land governed by State tenancy legislation.
Which section preserves a Hindu's right to make a will?
Explanation. Section 30 preserves every Hindu's right to dispose of property by will, overriding the intestate rules.
The 2005 Amendment's change to Section 23 concerned:
Explanation. Section 23, since omitted, had postponed a daughter's right to seek partition of a family dwelling house; the 2005 Amendment removed this restriction.
In Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma (2020), the Court held that a daughter's coparcenary right under Section 6:
Explanation. Vineeta Sharma held the daughter's right arises by birth and does not depend on the father-coparcener being alive on 9 September 2005.
Which two decisions did Vineeta Sharma reconcile the conflict between?
Explanation. Vineeta Sharma resolved the tension between Phulavati's 'living coparcener' requirement and Danamma's daughter-favourable outcome.
Which section abolished the pious obligation of a son to pay his father's debts?
Explanation. Section 6(4), added by the 2005 Amendment, abolishes the old pious-obligation doctrine for debts contracted after the amendment.
The Act's overriding effect over inconsistent pre-existing Hindu law texts is provided by:
Explanation. Section 4's non-obstante clause gives the Act overriding effect over any inconsistent prior Hindu law text, rule or interpretation.
The Hindu Succession (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1986 is deemed to have come into force on:
Explanation. The Act is deemed to have come into force on 5 September 1985.
The Act inserted which new Chapter into the Hindu Succession Act, 1956?
Explanation. Chapter II-A (Sections 29A, 29B and 29C) was inserted.
Section 29A(i) makes the daughter of a coparcener:
Explanation. The daughter becomes a coparcener by birth with the same rights and liabilities as a son.
Section 29A(ii) provides that on partition a daughter gets:
Explanation. The coparcenary property is divided so as to give a daughter the same share as a son.
Section 29A(iv) excludes from the equal-share rule:
Explanation. Clause (ii) does not apply to a daughter married before commencement or to a partition effected before it.
Under Section 29B, a female coparcener's interest generally devolves on her death by:
Explanation. Her interest passes by survivorship, except that it passes under the Act if she leaves such descendants.
Section 29C deals with:
Explanation. Section 29C gives a preferential right to acquire certain property in specified cases.
The central amendment giving daughters a birthright across India came into force in:
Explanation. The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 came into force on 9 September 2005.