Read the full set here, or use the practice card above to test yourself one question at a time.
Under the fault theory of divorce, the petitioner must prove:
Explanation. The fault theory requires proof of a specific matrimonial offence committed by the respondent.
Which of the following is NOT currently a ground for divorce under Section 13(1)?
Explanation. Section 13(1) now lists adultery, cruelty, desertion for two years, conversion, mental disorder, communicable venereal disease, renunciation of the world and presumed death. Leprosy is not among the grounds.
How many special grounds does section 13(2) give to a wife?
Explanation. Section 13(2) gives a wife four more grounds: pre-1955 polygamy of the husband, rape, sodomy or bestiality by him, non-cohabitation for a year after a maintenance decree, and repudiation of a marriage solemnized before she was fifteen.
Which of the following is a special ground of divorce available only to the wife under Section 13(2)?
Explanation. Pre-1955-Act bigamy by the husband, where the other wife is still alive, is a special ground under Section 13(2).
The "option of puberty" allows a wife to repudiate her marriage if it was solemnised:
Explanation. The option of puberty applies where marriage occurred before age 15, repudiated after 15 but before 18.
In Dastane v. Dastane (1975), the Supreme Court held that cruelty must be proved on:
Explanation. Dastane v. Dastane fixed the ordinary civil standard of proof for cruelty.
Section 13(1A) allows either spouse to seek divorce based on:
Explanation. Section 13(1A) permits divorce based on non-resumption of cohabitation after Sec. 9 or Sec. 10 decrees.
The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is primarily built on which theory of divorce?
Explanation. The Act is primarily built on the fault theory, with consent theory added later via Section 13-B.
In Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan (2023), a Constitution Bench held that the Supreme Court can dissolve a marriage under:
Explanation. Irretrievable breakdown is not a statutory ground, but the Supreme Court can dissolve a marriage directly under Article 142.
Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh (2007) gave:
Explanation. The Court gave illustrations, not a complete list, and said each marriage must be judged on its own facts.
Under Section 13-B(1), the parties must have been living separately for at least:
Explanation. Section 13-B(1) requires the parties to have lived separately for one year or more.
What is the minimum and maximum gap prescribed between the first and second motions under Section 13-B(2)?
Explanation. Section 13-B(2) prescribes a gap of not less than 6 months and not more than 18 months between the motions.
Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act bars presentation of any divorce petition within:
Explanation. Section 14 bars filing any divorce petition within one year of the marriage, save exceptional circumstances.
In Sureshta Devi v. Om Prakash (1991), the Supreme Court held that mutual consent under Section 13-B must:
Explanation. Sureshta Devi held that mutual consent must subsist right up to the passing of the decree.
In Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur (2017), the Supreme Court held that the six-month cooling-off period under Section 13-B(2) is:
Explanation. Amardeep Singh held the period directory, waivable by the trial court itself in appropriate cases.
A couple that mutually agrees to divorce within three months of their marriage:
Explanation. The Section 14 one-year bar applies regardless of mutual consent, so they cannot file yet.
If one spouse withdraws consent during the interim period between the two motions under Section 13-B, the court:
Explanation. Withdrawal of consent before the decree means the court cannot pass a mutual consent divorce decree.
Under section 13A, on a divorce petition (other than on conversion, renunciation or presumed death), the court may grant instead:
Explanation. Section 13A allows the court to grant judicial separation instead of divorce, except on the grounds of conversion, renunciation of the world and presumed death.