Read the full set here, or use the practice card above to test yourself one question at a time.
Under Section 7(1), a Hindu marriage may be solemnised according to:
Explanation. Section 7(1) defers to the customary rites and ceremonies of either party, not a single fixed ritual.
Under Section 7(2), a marriage involving Saptapadi becomes complete and binding at:
Explanation. Section 7(2) specifically deems the marriage complete and binding at the seventh step.
In Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande v. State of Maharashtra, the Supreme Court held that a bigamy conviction requires:
Explanation. The Court held that essential ceremonies of the second marriage must be strictly proved for a bigamy conviction.
Who must prove the essential ceremonies of a Hindu marriage?
Explanation. The person who relies on the marriage must prove the essential ceremonies. A few skipped formalities do not prove a custom to the contrary, and a custom must be proved by evidence under section 3(a).
Is Saptapadi compulsory for every Hindu marriage?
Explanation. Saptapadi's special rule applies only where it is part of the parties' own customary rites.
Under section 8(2), a person who breaks a State rule making registration compulsory is punishable with:
Explanation. Section 8(2) lets the State make the entry compulsory. A person who breaks the rule is punishable with a fine up to Rs 25, and the validity of the marriage is not affected.
If the essential ceremonies of a second marriage are never proved to have taken place, the second union is:
Explanation. Without proof of essential ceremonies, there is no valid second marriage, so a bigamy charge fails.
What does Section 7 primarily defer to when deciding which ceremonies are required?
Explanation. Section 7 defers to the customary rites of the specific parties getting married.
What is the primary purpose of registration under Section 8(1)?
Explanation. Section 8(1) exists to facilitate proof of a marriage, not to create it.
Under Section 8(5), failure to register a Hindu marriage:
Explanation. Section 8(5) expressly states that non-registration never affects a marriage's validity.
In Seema v. Ashwani Kumar, the Supreme Court directed:
Explanation. The Court directed all governments to frame rules for compulsory registration of marriages of all religions.
A couple who want a marriage without religious rites can marry under:
Explanation. The Special Marriage Act, 1954 allows a marriage without religious rites and requires notice and registration. Under section 8 of the Hindu Marriage Act, registration only helps to prove a marriage.
A State Government may make Section 8 registration:
Explanation. Section 8(2) allows a State to make registration compulsory, with a penalty prescribed for default.
Which of these remains valid even without registration, according to Section 8(5)?
Explanation. A properly solemnised marriage remains valid under Section 8(5) even without registration.
Seema v. Ashwani Kumar's directive on compulsory registration was based on concerns about:
Explanation. It was pointed out that compulsory registration would be a step in the right direction to prevent child marriages. The Court directed that marriages of all citizens, of all religions, be compulsorily registrable in the State where they are solemnized.
Which statement correctly describes the relationship between Seema v. Ashwani Kumar and Section 8(5)?
Explanation. The judgment directed compulsory registration machinery going forward without disturbing Section 8(5)'s validity rule.