Previous Osmania University LL.B. exam questions for Environmental Law, Unit III, each linked to the notes or case-law post that answers it. Sourced from actual OU Paper V: Environmental Law question papers — August/September 2013, February/March 2016, March/April 2017, September/October 2017, September/October 2021, and February 2026 (Code No. H-12005). Every question here is answerable entirely from what's already published on this site.
Part A — Short Answer
-
What is meant by air pollution? Mention any two causes. (February 2026)
-
Reserve forest. (August/September 2013)
-
NGT. (September/October 2021, March/April 2018)
Part B — Long Answer
-
Examine the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and its significance. (February 2026)
-
Discuss the powers and jurisdiction of the National Green Tribunal. (February 2026)
-
Write a note on Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. (August/September 2013)
Part C — Problem / Case-Study Questions
-
The State Government has undertaken construction of a mega hydro electric project in the Reserve Forest area, which is going to affect the natural environment of that area. A public interest litigation was filed to that effect before the Supreme Court. Discuss the admissibility of the petition. (September/October 2021; see T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India (1996))
-
A State Government, after a long time from the declaration of a sanctuary, reduced its area on the ground of economic development of the State. Advise. (September/October 2021 — reduced from 765 sq. km to 440 sq. km; September/October 2017 — reduced from 765 sq. km to 950 sq. km; asked in near-identical form across both sittings)
-
A PIL was filed by an NGO in the High Court highlighting mining activities which have denuded forest-covered hills of trees, accelerating soil erosion and causing landslides and blockage of underground water. The court ordered closure of the polluting quarries. Discuss. (September/October 2017, March/April 2017 — asked in near-identical form across both sittings; see T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India (1996))
-
A company fails to comply with the rules of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. What action can be taken against the company? (September/October 2017, March/April 2017 — asked in near-identical form across both sittings)
-
Several chemical factories are discharging all their effluents into a nearby river without treating them. When the State Pollution Control Board insisted on the construction of effluent treatment plants, they pleaded that they have no money. Argue. (August/September 2013; see M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, the Ganga Pollution Case (1987))
Questions are drawn from previous Osmania University LL.B. examination papers for study and revision purposes only.