Home  ›  3-Year LL.B.  ›  Constitutional Law – I  ›  Unit 1 — Constitutional Development and Framing of the Indian Constitution  ›  The Government of India Act, 1935 — The Immediate Blueprint
Home  ›  Constitutional Law – I  ›  Unit 1  ›  The Government of India Act, 1935 — The Immediate Blueprint

4. The Government of India Act, 1935 — The Immediate Blueprint

14 min read
Unit 1 · Constitutional Development and Framing of the Indian Constitution

If the Government of India Act, 1919 tested representative government and found it wanting, the Government of India Act, 1935 is the Act that actually gave the Indian Constitution its skeleton — its federal scheme, its lists of powers, its Governor's office, even its Federal Court. This post explains why lawyers call 1935 the blueprint, not just another reform.

The Problem This Topic Solves

Dyarchy under the 1919 Act had a structural flaw: elected ministers held responsibility for subjects like education and health without controlling the finance and law-and-order machinery those subjects actually depended on. By the late 1920s this was widely recognised as unworkable, and Britain needed a genuinely new constitutional settlement for India — one detailed enough to survive contact with real administration. The Government of India Act, 1935 was that attempt, and it is worth studying closely because so much of its machinery survived, almost unchanged, into independent India's own Constitution.

Background — How the 1935 Act Came About

1. The Simon Commission Report, 1930 — The all-British Statutory Commission set up under the 1919 Act's own review clause submitted its report in 1930, recommending an end to dyarchy at the provincial level and a larger role for elected Indians in provincial government, while proposing a federal structure for British India as a whole.

2. The Round Table Conferences, 1930–1932 — Three conferences held in London brought together British officials, Indian political leaders, and princely-state representatives to negotiate the shape of the next constitutional reform, including the idea of an All-India Federation joining British India and the princely states together.

3. The White Paper, 1933, and the Act itself — The British Government's proposals were published as a White Paper in 1933, examined by a Joint Select Committee of Parliament, and finally enacted as the Government of India Act, 1935 — at the time the longest Act ever passed by the British Parliament.

Key Features of the Government of India Act, 1935

1. An All-India Federation (proposed) — The Act proposed a federation of the British Indian provinces together with those princely states that chose to accede. This federal part of the Act never actually came into force, because not enough princely states acceded to it before the Second World War intervened — an important nuance examiners often test.

2. Provincial Autonomy — Dyarchy was abolished at the provincial level. Provinces were given genuinely responsible government: ministers responsible to elected provincial legislatures now governed all provincial subjects, not just a "transferred" half — though Governors retained special and discretionary powers they could exercise in defined emergency situations.

3. Dyarchy Shifted to the Centre — Since the federal part never took effect, a form of dyarchy was introduced at the Centre instead: subjects like defence, foreign affairs, and ecclesiastical affairs remained with the Governor-General, while other subjects were meant to go to ministers responsible to the central legislature.

4. A Federal Legislature — The Act provided for a bicameral federal legislature — a Federal Assembly (lower house) and a Council of State (upper house) — modelled on, and expanding, the bicameral structure the 1919 Act had first introduced at the centre.

5. Distribution of Legislative Powers — Three Lists — For the first time, the Act divided legislative subjects into three exhaustive lists: a Federal List (subjects only the central legislature could legislate on), a Provincial List (subjects only provincial legislatures could legislate on), and a Concurrent List (subjects both could legislate on). This three-list structure is the direct ancestor of the Union List, State List, and Concurrent List in the Seventh Schedule of the Indian Constitution.

6. The Federal Court, 1937 — The Act established a Federal Court at Delhi, with jurisdiction over disputes between the Centre and provinces and appeals from High Courts — the direct institutional predecessor of the Supreme Court of India.

7. Provincial Legislatures Enlarged — The franchise was extended, and the larger provinces were given bicameral legislatures of their own for the first time.

8. Public Service Commissions — The Act provided for a Federal Public Service Commission and Provincial Public Service Commissions — the direct ancestors of the Union Public Service Commission and State Public Service Commissions under the Indian Constitution.

Must Know
  • The federal part of the 1935 Act never actually came into force; only provincial autonomy operated in practice, from the 1937 provincial elections onward
  • The three-list division of legislative powers (Federal/Provincial/Concurrent) is the direct model for the Union/State/Concurrent Lists in the Indian Constitution's Seventh Schedule
  • The Federal Court, 1937 is the direct institutional predecessor of the Supreme Court of India
  • Dyarchy was abolished in the provinces by this Act, but a version of it was introduced at the Centre instead, because the federation itself never took effect

The 1935 Act's direct descendants in the Constitution:

  • Three Lists (1935) → Union, State & Concurrent Lists (Seventh Schedule)
  • Federal Court, 1937 → Supreme Court of India
  • Public Service Commissions → UPSC & State Public Service Commissions
  • Office of Governor → Governor's office & emergency provisions

Why the 1935 Act Is Called the "Skeleton" of the Indian Constitution

When the Constituent Assembly sat down to draft India's Constitution after independence, it did not start from a blank page. A very large share of the Constitution's administrative and structural machinery — the federal scheme with its three lists, the office and powers of the Governor, the idea of an independent Public Service Commission, the structure of the higher judiciary, many of the emergency provisions — was carried over from the Government of India Act, 1935, refined and given democratic content rather than invented afresh. This is precisely why constitutional lawyers describe the 1935 Act as the "skeleton" on which the Constitution's flesh — Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles, universal adult franchise, a sovereign republic — was later built.

Should Know
  • The Government of India Act, 1935 (with modifications made by the Indian Independence Act, 1947) actually continued to operate as India's working constitutional document during the transitional period from August 1947 until the Constitution came into force on 26 January 1950 — the Governor-General served as constitutional head under this adapted framework throughout that period
  • The Reserve Bank of India was also established in 1935, under a separate Act passed the same year, reflecting the same broader wave of institution-building

Government of India Act, 1919 vs. 1935 — At a Glance

AspectGoI Act, 1919GoI Act, 1935
DyarchyIntroduced in the provincesAbolished in the provinces; shifted to the Centre instead
Federal structureNoneProposed (All-India Federation), but never came into force
Distribution of powersNot systematically listedThree exhaustive lists — Federal, Provincial, Concurrent
Apex courtNone createdFederal Court established, 1937

A Practical Example

Suppose, under the 1935 Act, a province wanted to legislate on public health, while the central legislature wanted to legislate on currency and coinage, and both wished to legislate on marriage and divorce. The three-list scheme answered this cleanly: public health sat in the Provincial List (province-only), currency sat in the Federal List (Centre-only), and marriage and divorce sat in the Concurrent List (either could legislate, with Central law prevailing in case of conflict). This is the exact logic — right down to some of the exact subject headings — that the Indian Constitution's Seventh Schedule still uses today for the Union, State, and Concurrent Lists.

Quick Revision Points

  • Simon Commission Report (1930) → Round Table Conferences (1930–32) → White Paper (1933) → Government of India Act, 1935
  • Federal part of the 1935 Act never came into force — princely states did not accede in sufficient numbers
  • Provincial autonomy replaced dyarchy in the provinces; a version of dyarchy shifted to the Centre instead
  • Three-list distribution of powers (Federal/Provincial/Concurrent) — direct ancestor of today's Union/State/Concurrent Lists
  • Federal Court, 1937 — direct predecessor of the Supreme Court of India
  • Federal and Provincial Public Service Commissions — direct ancestors of the UPSC and State PSCs
  • The 1935 Act (as adapted by the Indian Independence Act, 1947) remained India's working constitutional document from August 1947 until 26 January 1950
Home Browse Search Saved