| Literal meaning | The King can do no wrong |
|---|---|
| Pronunciation | rex non POH-test pek-KAH-ray |
In old English law the ruler could not be sued in his own courts for wrongs, because the ruler was held incapable of wrong. It is the old base of sovereign immunity.
In old English law a person injured by a servant of the Crown could not sue the Crown itself.
India has not accepted this maxim in full. The State can be held liable for the wrongful acts of its servants, except for sovereign functions.
English law has since allowed suits against the Crown by statute. In India, Article 300 of the Constitution deals with suits against the Union and States.
Asked with sovereign immunity and Kasturi Lal.
King's crown cannot be sued: old rule, now much reduced.
The old idea of royal immunity has been cut down in India.