Home  ›  Legal Maxims  ›  Constitutional  ›  Rex non potest peccare
Home  ›  Legal Maxims  ›  Rex non potest peccare

Rex non potest peccare

Maxim
Constitutional
Literal meaningThe King can do no wrong
Pronunciationrex non POH-test pek-KAH-ray

In old English law the ruler could not be sued in his own courts for wrongs, because the ruler was held incapable of wrong. It is the old base of sovereign immunity.

Example

In old English law a person injured by a servant of the Crown could not sue the Crown itself.

Case laws
  • Kasturi Lal v. State of U.P. (1965), Supreme Court: the State was held not liable for a tort committed by its servants in the course of sovereign functions.
Exceptions / limits

India has not accepted this maxim in full. The State can be held liable for the wrongful acts of its servants, except for sovereign functions.

Indian vs English position

English law has since allowed suits against the Crown by statute. In India, Article 300 of the Constitution deals with suits against the Union and States.

Exam tip

Asked with sovereign immunity and Kasturi Lal.

Memory trick

King's crown cannot be sued: old rule, now much reduced.

Key takeaway

The old idea of royal immunity has been cut down in India.

Home Browse Search Saved