Home  ›  Legal Maxims  ›  Contract  ›  Qui tacet consentire videtur
Home  ›  Legal Maxims  ›  Qui tacet consentire videtur

Qui tacet consentire videtur

Maxim
Contract
Literal meaningHe who is silent is taken to agree
Pronunciationkwee TAH-ket kon-sen-TEE-ray vih-DAY-tur

In some situations silence is taken as agreement. In contract law the rule is the opposite: silence is not acceptance of an offer.

Example

A person says that if he hears nothing, he will treat his offer as accepted. The other party stays silent. There is no contract.

Case laws
  • Felthouse v. Bindley (1862), England: an uncle wrote that if he heard no more he would consider the horse his nephew's. Held: silence cannot be turned into acceptance.
Exceptions / limits
  • Silence can amount to fraud where the person has a duty to speak (Explanation to Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872).
  • Silence can be taken as consent where the parties' dealings or the law make it so.
Exam tip

Asked with acceptance and Felthouse v. Bindley.

Memory trick

Silence is not a yes in contract.

Key takeaway

In contract, silence does not by itself mean acceptance.

Home Browse Search Saved