Home  ›  Legal Maxims  ›  Constitutional  ›  Nemo judex in causa sua
Home  ›  Legal Maxims  ›  Nemo judex in causa sua

Nemo judex in causa sua

Maxim
Constitutional
Literal meaningNo one should be a judge in their own cause
PronunciationNAY-moh YOO-dex in COW-za SOO-ah

A person who decides a case must be free from bias. No one may judge a dispute in which they have a personal interest. This is the rule against bias, one of the two rules of natural justice.

Example

A university committee investigates a complaint and one committee member is the person who made the complaint. The decision can be set aside for bias.

Essentials
  1. Actual bias: the decision-maker has a personal or financial interest.
  2. Apparent bias: a reasonable person would suspect that the decision-maker may be biased.
Case laws
  • A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1969), Supreme Court: a person who was a candidate for selection also sat on the selection board. Held: the selection was bad because of the risk of bias.
Exceptions / limits
  • Necessity: if no other person can decide the matter, a biased person may still decide.
  • A statute can allow an interested person to decide.
Exam tip

Asked with audi alteram partem under the principles of natural justice. Name the three kinds of bias: pecuniary, personal and subject-matter.

Memory trick

Judge, not party: one person cannot wear both hats.

Key takeaway

A decision-maker with an interest in the matter must not decide it.

Home Browse Search Saved