Home  ›  Legal Maxims  ›  Evidence  ›  Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus
Home  ›  Legal Maxims  ›  Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus

Maxim
Evidence
Literal meaningFalse in one thing, false in everything
PronunciationFAL-sus in OO-noh FAL-sus in OM-nih-bus

If a witness lies about one important point, the rest of the evidence may be doubted. In India it is not a binding rule of law, but only a caution for the court.

Example

A witness is shown to have lied about where he was standing. The court may be careful before accepting the rest of his evidence.

Case laws
  • Nisar Ali v. State of U.P. (1957), Supreme Court: the maxim is not a rule of law in India. The court must separate the true from the false.
Exceptions / limits

Indian courts may accept the part of a witness's evidence that is reliable and reject the rest.

Exam tip

Remember that Indian courts do not treat it as a rule of law.

Memory trick

One lie, whole story under suspicion.

Key takeaway

In India a proved lie only calls for caution; it does not reject all the evidence.

Home Browse Search Saved